MUSIC / THE PROMS: Too authentic for its own good: A 19th-century hall is not ideal for 18th-century music, writes Nicholas Williams

Nicholas Williams
Tuesday 03 August 1993 18:02 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

HOW far do you go to achieve musical authenticity? Period instruments and costumes? The question has been asked often enough, yet with no clear answer. The Hanover Band's performance of Bach's F minor harpsichord concerto at Monday's Prom - inaudible, at least from block L of the stalls - did throw some light on the question.

Radio 3 listeners were probably unaware of any acoustical problem. But for others at the back of the hall, or high up in the gallery, the music was nothing more than a faint aural disturbance somewhere in the middle distance. Still, the strings managed to articulate the first movement rhythms with impressive unanimity, and in the slow movement Anthony Halstead stitched together a sequence of harpsichord arabesques like ornate embroidery. But the 19th-century interior swallowed up the 18th-century sound. Performance space, like authentic technique, is rarely ideal. In an imperfect world, you make do with what's available.

Perhaps that's why many musicians prefer the recording studio, where everything can be directed to capturing the ultimate sound. Even so, things go missing. One lesson to emerge from the Albert Hall experience on Monday, in a concert not otherwise remarkable for programming flair, was to do with concerto form itself. Instruments, like people, can behave strangely in public places. In the harpsichord concerto, it was a curious matter that the music carried further in the slow movement than in the outer movements, where the instrument went full tilt against the orchestral tutti, yet the whole ensemble made a puny noise.

In the 5th Brandenburg Concerto, flute and violin soloists imparted a more penetrating quality not only to the solo harpsichord itself, but also to the entire string orchestra. Admittedly there was also plenty of strong, forward playing, with the first Allegro's long, central buildup - like a playful anticipation of Philip Glass. With the 2nd Brandenburg for a quartet of soloists - recorder, oboe, trumpet and violin - it was the period oboe, expertly played by Anthony Robson, that was the equal of the trumpet. Even the recorder, in duet, imparted a bright haze to the trumpet's highest notes and, in the Elysian rhapsody of the slow movement, filled the hall's vast spaces with its languid song.

How the details of Bach's forms compensate for these inequalities creatively is a fascinating conjecture. No doubt scholars can provide some answers. Perhaps Monday's lesson was that no great harm is done in trying to get authenticity, but there must be limits.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in