MUSIC / Halle / Pommier - Free Trade Hall, Manchester

David Fanning
Friday 09 October 1992 18:02 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

The Halle has made a spirited start to the season under the new aegis of Kent Nagano, and to criticise it for risky programming seems like biting the hand that has only just started to feed us. Sadly Roussel's Second Symphony, with which Jean-Bernard Pommier concluded his programme on Thursday, was one risk that failed to pay off.

If a super-refined ear for harmonic elaboration was all it took, this score might well be a masterpiece (and Bax's symphonies are proof enough that such hypertrophy can yield convincing large-scale structures). But Roussel's rhythmical language is so stale, his phrasing so persistently short-winded, that any sense of overall growth goes by the board.

The Halle's painstaking account might have been more rewarding had it not followed Prokofiev's equally overwritten (though vastly more characterful) Second Piano Concerto.

Here the engagement of Shura Cherkassky, just one day after his 81st birthday, was another risk. Inevitably there are now passages where allowance has to be made for age - the huge first-movement cadenza has to come up rather frequently for air, and rhythms are less sharp than of old. But there was much to relish in the last two movements, and the fact that the piece remains in Cherkassky's repertoire at all is cause for astonishment.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in