Murray Perahia, RFH Winning first prize in an international competition isn't everything, says Adrian Jack

MUSIC Georgia Tomassi, Wigmore Hall

Adrian Jack
Friday 28 June 1996 18:02 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

People still jump at the mention of a first prize in a big international competition, however many times they've been disappointed by the winners in the past. Giorgia Tomassi won the Rubinstein Competition in Tel Aviv four years ago and gave her UK debut recital at the Wigmore Hall last Sunday evening. She's in her mid-twenties and was evidently an early developer, getting another prize as the youngest graduate in Italy. Her choice of programme already said something about her, because it was all big Romantic music that made heavy technical demands. She played both books of Brahms's Paganini Variations, and Liszt's Sonata in B minor, and began with three movements from Bach's E major Violin Partita arranged by Rachmaninov. She played all this well, which in itself is no mean achievement. But she never ventured beyond orthodox good sense, so there was little excitement, and no intensity in the Liszt. The Sonata is full of temptations to go Gothic and over-dramatise; perhaps Tomassi meant to reclaim it as a seriously thoughtful work but, in effect, she depressed Liszt's spirit and tamed it into sobriety.

During his temporary disability with a thumb infection two or three years ago, Murray Perahia made a particular study of Bach, and at the Royal Festival Hall on Wednesday he gave over the first half of his recital to Scarlatti, Bach and Handel. Three Sonatas by Scarlatti were immaculate but rather tame, although his rapid fingerwork in the A major Sonata, K212, was exquisite.

To Bach's English Suite in F major he brought polished, not to say glossy pianism, but of a generalised, all-purpose character. Neither Handel's Chaconne in G nor Suite in E, ending with the "Harmonious Blacksmith" variations, had much personality. It was all in the manner of treating museum pieces with kid gloves.

But Perahia was in his element after the interval, with Schumann's Kreisleriana. It's a work he's lived with for many years, but his concentration was complete - every phrase was meant, and all the brilliance fully realised as well as the most tender intimacies. You could see him giving extra special attention to the wide-eyed, little right-hand hops in the final number, and they were gorgeous.

After that, Mendelssohn's Andante and Rondo capriccioso took off like a dream, and to prolong the blissful mood, Perahia added two serene Impromptus in E flat and A flat, from Schubert's first set.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in