Monitor: The American press comments on the ruling which finds Clinton in contempt of court
All the News of the World
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.THANKS TO Federal Judge Susan Webber Wright, Clinton can now lay claim to another shameful distinction: he's not just our second president to be impeached, he's also the only president ever to be held in contempt of court. He may truly believe that his acquittal salvaged his reputation. But he now stands branded as a willful, deliberate, contemptuous liar. That is his shame to bear - and all America's, too.
New York Post
WRIGHT FOUND Clinton in civil contempt of court. The second president to be impeached becomes the first to be so cited. The monetary penalty attached to the contempt ruling includes payment to Jones for attorneys' fees and similar expenses arising out of Clinton's "willful failure" to give honest answers in his deposition. Clinton, a lawyer, could be disbarred under a canon prohibiting "dishonesty, fraud, deceit or misrepresentation". It has long been obvious that his deposition in the Jones suit, in which he swore "I have never had sexual relations with Monica Lewinsky", was a lie.
LA Times
JUDGE WEBBER Wright's ruling puts into the legal and historical record that Clinton was untruthful and deliberately misleading, and assigns a legal sanction to uphold the rule of law. The financial penalties calling for the President to reimburse the court $1,202 to cover the expenses incurred by the judge in travelling to Washington to preside over "his tainted deposition", and to pay Ms Jones any expenses incurred because of his untruthful behaviour are symbolic. He would be wise not to challenge them. The Judge has signalled her desire to bring this matter to a close.
New York Times
IN CASE we had forgotten what justice was, a judge in Little Rock reminded the country yesterday. Judge Wright held Clinton in contempt of court for not testifying truthfully. President or no president, there are apparently some things Judge Wright is not going to put up with in her court. It was electrifying, it was galvanizing, to be reminded that there is still law, there is still truth, there is still justice.
Arkansas Democrat Gazette
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments