Monitor
All the News of the World American reaction to a judge's order that Bill Clinton pay $90,000 for false testimony
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.IF A sexual scandal that revealed the most intimate details of his personal life and an impeachment trial did not humble President Clinton, it's unlikely that a $90,000 fine will.
Still, the sanction imposed last Thursday by a federal judge in Arkansas against the President for giving "intentionally false" testimony in the Paula Jones lawsuit raises faint, if unlikely, hopes that Clinton might yet come to understand how he has sullied his privileged position. The fine underscores the important message that no one is above the truth, not even the President of the US.
It should be a sobering lesson for Clinton, who put the country through so much pain and showed such a lack of respect for his office. But his deftness at skirting around his responsibility, coupled with the timing of the Linda Tripp indictment on charges of illegal wiretapping, almost ensure that he will once again be able to substitute a theory of victimization for his own culpability.
San Francisco Chronicle
THERE IS something tawdry about a president paying his way out of a hole he dug himself into by lying under oath. Judge Wright took note of this, but also gave what we consider to be a good reason for ordering him to pay up:
"The Court has determined that the President deliberately violated this Court's disc-overy orders, thereby under- mining the integrity of the judicial system, and the sanctions must be imposed to redress the President's misconduct and to deter others who might consider emulating the President's misconduct."
In other words, boys and girls, it is time to find another role model.
San Jose Mercury News
THE COURTS will not respond to this President's contempt with contempt, any more than the system as a whole will respond to his disdain with its disdain. You can feel it in the heavy, unbearable air of an Arkansas summer. It is not contempt or disdain, but just a vast indifference. For Arkansas in particular, it's a rather poignant sensation, after all the hopes Bill Clinton raised. Light lie the ashes of our pride.
Arkansas Democrat-Gazette
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments