LettersIn Brief
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: I disagree with your leading article (20 April) that the failure of Italy's referendum on abolishing proportional representation is a blow to referenda. This referendum worked perfectly as a defence against politicians trying to lead the electorate where they did not want to go. If the majority of those eligible to vote were not in favour, the democratic process had to ensure that the proposal was rejected.
Sir: Having a Liverpool accent, I've had to learn to cope with my "disability". This has meant not speaking whilst using my credit cards (to avoid delays whilst they're checked against the list of stolen ones) and always being prepared to "take a joke" about Merseyside, its people, my family, my history and myself. Well, not any more. Jack Straw's comments, though offensive, were not unusual ("Straw says sorry for Liverpool insult", 21 April). I am convinced that no matter how well qualified I am or what community-minded role I undertake, I'll always be disadvantaged in Britain.
Sir: It will be necessary to redefine the role of the House of Lords before the method of selection can be seriously debated. Its present role is as a revising chamber for all legislation passed by the House of Commons.
The devolution of some legislative powers to Scotland and Wales will create a democratically unbalanced situation in which devolved legislation will not be subject to revision by the Lords; whereas legislation pertaining to England would be. If it is desirable to have a second revising Chamber why only for UK and English legislation?
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments