Letters: Ratings Game
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: Will Wyatt, chief executive of BBC Broadcast, asserts (Podium, 3 March) that the demise of ITV's News at Ten demonstrates that "ITV and the BBC are not in the same game .... ITV shoves inconvenient genres out of the way". By contrast he claims that the BBC continues virtuously to schedule its current affairs in peak time.
How does he reconcile this with the move of Panorama from 9.30 to 10pm, Omnibus from 10 to 10.40 and Question Time from 10 to 11?
BBC1 is playing exactly the same game as ITV, scheduling "inconvenient genres" out of the way where they will do least damage to ratings and share. Given the unique way the BBC is funded, is there not an onus on BBC Broadcast to schedule BBC 1 current affairs strands at a time convenient for people to watch them?
PETER MENNEER
Claygate, Surrey
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments