Letters: Banana Battle
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: You report that the United States has imposed its 100 per cent tariff on EU luxury goods "rather than wait for a World Trade Organisation ruling" ("British fury at US over `banana war' ", 5 March). This is not strictly correct. A ruling on the issue was handed down by a WTO panel in 1997, which was broadly in favour of the US, and this was confirmed on appeal by the WTO appellate body.
The present impasse has been reached because the WTO dispute resolution procedure does not provide effectively for enforcement of judgments, a defect which needs to be addressed in the next round of negotiations under the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade.
Before further damage is inflicted on the WTO by the parties to this dispute, both the US and the EU member states should reflect that the GATT system came into being after the Second World War as part of a package to ensure that such conflicts would never occur again. The GATT has been part of the system which has ensured global peace for the last half century. If the future of the WTO is threatened by this dispute, then GATT and all it stands for is also at risk.
Professor GAVIN McFARLANE
Department of Law
London Guildhall University
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments