Letter: Woodhead's targets

Philip D. Delnon
Tuesday 20 July 1999 18:02 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Sir: Chris Woodhead employs the familiar sophist's trick of putting words into his opponents' mouths in order to set up an easy target which he can then hit ("Why testing is no enemy of children's creativity", 20 July). Has anyone said that children should not be able to read, write and count?

Simple common sense is the one thing that has been lacking in trendy educational initiatives over the last two decades. Simple common sense suggests that when you write a National Curriculum, you pilot it in a number of schools rather than rush it into nation-wide application.

Simple common sense suggests that when the first version of the National Curriculum proves inadequate, you take more time over the second version and run a pilot scheme.

Simple common sense suggests that when secondary teachers of English are delivering three different versions of the National Curriculum to three different year groups, someone has blundered.

There are cogent arguments for saying that the National Curriculum has hindered, rather than promoted, the drive to raise standards.

As for Chris Woodhead's assertion that "good teachers are not being driven from our schools by the doctrinaire, bureaucratic stupidity of current government policies", it is only because the escape-route has been barred.

PHILIP D DELNON

Swanscombe, Kent

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in