Letter: Why peers must go

The Rev Robert M. E. Paterson
Sunday 22 November 1998 19:02 EST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Sir: It seems curious that a majority of peers, who do not vote in national elections, are taking such a principled stand in favour of knowing the names of candidates in each constituency during the 1999 European elections ("Blair vows Lords' defiance will be the last roar of the dinosaurs", 19 November). I wonder how many of them would know the name of the current MEP for their constituency.

In fact, I wonder how many of the hoi polloi who raise their voices in protest against PR know the name of their MEP.

The Rev ROBERT M E PATERSON

Cowbridge,

Somerset

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in