Letter: Why peers must go
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: It is proving very difficult for me to work out why the Conservative Party is opposed to a closed list system of voting for the forthcoming European elections.
The Conservative Party supports first past the post, which is a closed party system. I have recently been selected to my local panel of Labour prospective candidates to stand in the May local elections under first past the post. I will then go before a local branch of my party to be selected as a candidate. This process is controlled by the party with no participation of the wider electorate, nor does first past the post involve the electorate listing who they want to vote for in order of preference. They only put a cross by the name of the party candidate that they wish to support. Surely this is a closed system of voting?
If the Conservative Party is so keen on an open party system of voting they should be arguing for a different voting system to first past the post.
MATTHEW RAVENHILL
Taunton, Somerset
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments