Letter: Why circumcise?
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: The Rev Neil Dawson asks where circumcision came from and why (letter, 29 September). The answer is that it probably came from the desert, where it was a useful precaution against sand getting trapped between foreskin and glans - a painful condition with possible abrasion and infection.
From the fact that it is practised by the aboriginal Australians, it must either have originated tens of thousands of years ago, before they were isolated from other peoples, or be the spontaneous response to similar conditions in widely separate places.
When nomads settled and became farmers, they found religious reasons for continuing what had become a useless custom. It is easy to see how the operation came to be invested with meaning, given its emotionally charged object. The Jewish variety was for many centuries just the symbolic cutting of the tip; removal of the whole foreskin was introduced only when too many Jews started passing themselves off as uncircumcised in the Greek world.
Female "circumcision" presumably originated by analogy with the male variety, since it does not occur without it. Al-Shafi'i, the only doctor of Islamic law who taught that it was obligatory to circumcise girls, explicitly based his doctrine on this analogy.
P J STEWART
St Anne's College, Oxford
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments