Letter: Votes that count
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Votes that count
Sir: Donald Macintyre suggests that the alternative vote (AV) - part of the Jenkins Commission's recommended formula (AV + top-up) for elections to the House of Commons - "institutionalises tactical voting" ("Liberal Democrats have a noble tradition, but it needs redefining", 10 August). On the contrary, it is first-past-the-post (FPTP) voting which obliges many voters to choose between heart and head when voting in a marginal seat, as anyone who voted tactically in May 1997 will affirm.
As a member of the Labour Party in Bristol West, I didn't have that dilemma: an Observer poll on the weekend before election day showed that Valerie Davey (now) MP was best placed to topple William Waldegrave, but I am aware of many Liberal Democrat supporters who voted tactically to give Bristol West our first ever Labour MP. We can't always rely on opinion polls, and shouldn't have to engage in the second-guessing that FPTP voting produces.
Preferential voting would allow us all to make more considered and honest choices, and ensure that no MP could be elected on as small a share of the vote as 26 per cent, as has occurred with FPTP. Adding a small top- up to achieve proportionality, as recommended by Jenkins, would ensure that most voters would see some reward for their visit to the polling booth - wherever they lived.
NIGEL CURRIE
Bristol
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments