Letter: Vote for Jenkins
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: I welcome the importance TheIndependent has placed on debate about how we vote for our MPs. I was therefore glad to see two pro-reformers, Ken Livingstone ("A perfect blueprint for splitting the Labour Party", 4 November) and Martin Linton (Right of Reply, 5 November), contributing to that debate.
However, Ken's dislike for Alternative Vote (AV) may have led him to ignore the top-ups of MPs in the AV-Plus system that would significantly correct the imbalances he dislikes, such as disproportionality and geographical polarisation, inherent in first-past-the-post (FPTP) or AV alone.
Unlike Ken, I do not believe that adoption of AV-Plus would cause the Labour Party to split. The fact that AV-Plus enables single parties to control the House of Commons, albeit without a landslide majority, encourages the party to stay together.
AV-Plus is in effect the only show in town. If we fail to change to the new system, we will not get another chance. I hope Ken, on reflection, will join the campaign for a much fairer voting system.
We must, as politicians, remember that we do not, and should not, live in a society where politicians do things for people, not with them. That is why we will have a referendum on whether to embrace change. It is for the people of this country, not the politicians, to have the final say and that is where the most important debate of all will take place.
RICHARD BURDEN MP
(Birmingham Northfield, Lab)
Chair, All-Party Group on Electoral Reform
House of Commons
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments