Letter: Verdict on GM trials

Dr Douglas Parr
Friday 30 July 1999 18:02 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Sir: Your leading article is curiously naive. The underlying premise is that science can always give answers to difficult questions and that these questions can be set by closed groups of policy and Whitehall elites.

Supermarkets have had to respond to consumer concern by removing GM material from food. Much opinion research shows that the concerns run much deeper than that. Where is this new technology going? What is its meaning for society at large? With huge food surpluses, do we need GM crops at all? Is it fair that consumers and the environment have to take the risk whilst AgrEvo and Monsanto get the financial rewards?

Astonishingly, the peaceful removal of GM crops is practically the only point of entry UK citizens currently have to prevent genetic pollution of the countryside. At no point does the regulatory system for GM crops consult or seek public permission to proceed with these open-air experiments. At no point has the public given its consent.

I'm disappointed that The Independent cannot reach deeper into the GM issue than "we need more scientific testing".

Dr DOUGLAS PARR

Campaign Centre Director

Greenpeace UK, London N1

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in