Letter: Verdict on GM trials

Karly Graham
Friday 30 July 1999 18:02 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Sir: In your editorial "Greenpeace takes direct action against its own credibility" (28 July), you ask: "Is the whole of the British environment so threatened by seven - now four - GM crop trials?" Is a threat to only some of the environment therefore acceptable? Your suggestion that we should continue the trials to see whether they have an "awful effect on the environment" beggars belief.

As organisers of a recent well attended and mannerly local public meeting held near the site in Lyng, we had no idea that Greenpeace were arranging this direct action. We have been researching the potential risks of this crop to all local people's livelihoods, as well as the environment.

We are taking the democratic road, and yet we are constantly frustrated by the evasiveness that meets our direct questions. Time after time our letters go unanswered and our calls are not returned. There seems nothing ordinary people can do to prevent this unnecessary and unwanted technology being forced upon us in the interests of big business. It's not about science; it's about money.

Yes, we did vote for this government. No, they don't listen to our concerns.

KARLY GRAHAM

Sparham, Norfolk

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in