Letter: Unnatural farming
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: Michael McCarthy ("Why Britain's farmers are making a loss on nearly everything they grow", 28 August) is quite wrong in stating that the Government "abruptly scrapped" the calf processing aid scheme at the start of this month. This compensatory scheme was in fact extended twice beyond its original cut-off date and the Government made it quite clear, on numerous occasions, that there was no possibility of its being extended for a third time.
When the scheme was first extended, there were suggestions that it would be better to phase out the payment by reducing it from pounds 56 per head to, say, pounds 20 and extending the period of payment accordingly. However, the National Farmers' Union insisted that the payment must continue at the full rate. So if anybody is to blame for the "sudden" withdrawal of this benefit at a particularly bad time, it is the farmers themselves.
PETER ALLEN
Worthing, West Sussex
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments