Letter: University pay gap

Oliver Curry
Friday 12 November 1999 19:02 EST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Sir: I have to take issue with your report, "Exposed: damning proof of the pay divide" (11 November). The results do not constitute evidence of sex discrimination.

Any serious investigation of the question whether there is sex discrimination in pay has to look at more than just average salaries. For example, for almost any measure of productivity - such as publication records - men, on average, out-perform women. It is legitimate for universities to "discriminate" between productive and unproductive researchers.

As your study also points out, men, on average, work in fields that are more highly paid than those taken up by women. Why are these fields highly paid? Is it because of discrimination? No.

The reason that an engineering professor gets paid more than a professor of French literature is twofold: first, there are a lot more people who are capable of excelling at French literature than there are who are able to excel in engineering; second, there is a market outside the university for engineers, but there is not for those with PhDs in French literature.

That is why law professors make more than sociology professors, and why professors of medicine earn more than professors of history.

As the economist Jennifer Roback has noted, "Once we observe that people sacrifice money income for other pleasurable things, we can infer next to nothing by comparing the income of one person with another."

OLIVER CURRY

London NW6

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in