Letter: Trial by jury
Your support helps us to tell the story
This election is still a dead heat, according to most polls. In a fight with such wafer-thin margins, we need reporters on the ground talking to the people Trump and Harris are courting. Your support allows us to keep sending journalists to the story.
The Independent is trusted by 27 million Americans from across the entire political spectrum every month. Unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock you out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. But quality journalism must still be paid for.
Help us keep bring these critical stories to light. Your support makes all the difference.
Sir: Amid the noise and smoke of battle over the right to jury trial ("Thousands lose right to jury trial", 19 May), I fear we are in danger of losing sight of the basic reason for its existence. For as long as the English judiciary system clings to the medieval practice of concentrating solely on prosecution, a final showdown in front of a jury is essential.
I, for one, would be content to forgo a jury trial only in a country which has an effective and independent investigation agency (such as a Procurator Fiscal or examining magistrate) which can consider the whole of the evidence, not just that deemed relevant by the police and a Crown prosecutor.
DAVID WALKER
Fareham,
Hampshire
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments