Letter: Trade in misery

Howard Chesney
Tuesday 30 November 1999 19:02 EST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Sir: Some questions for Diane Coyle ("Hands off the World trade Organisation. It's the only hope that the poor have", 29 November).

Why is trade beneficial? Why is it good to sack British workers making soap, textiles or stainless steel products so that similar products made by cheap labour can be imported? Who is to find the money for unemployment pay?

Why is it beneficial for me to buy an onion grown perhaps hundreds of miles away rather than grow one in my own garden?

Why cannot poor people abroad work for themselves to provide their own needs of housing, clothes and food instead of working for me at starvation wages?

Why do we need American beef when there is a surplus of our own?

Can she not understand that the whole WTO business is inspired by American business, with their unquenchable desire to sell more and make even more profit?

If she approves of starvation wages to provide either cheaper goods or bigger profits for multinationals, why do we have a minimum wage and labour legislation in Europe?

Apart from a few instances of comparative advantage due to climate, the main beneficiaries of international trade are shipping and insurance companies. Diane Coyle takes no account of the colossal pollution and waste of fuel all this transport involves.

HOWARD CHENEY

Shipston on Stour, Warkwickshire

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in