Letter: This toothless Bill
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: As expected, the draft Bill on Freedom of Information is a travesty of the notion. We need only look at the current GM debate to see why an Act with teeth is vital. Having access to the decision-making process itself is the only way citizens stand even a small chance of having some input on decisions being made "on high".
The core of the US freedom of information laws is quite simple. All information held by the government on citizens (either US or foreign) is accessible through the correct procedures. The onus is on government to justify why it should not be released. The US laws stipulate five headings under which information should not be released and it's up to the relevant government department to show specifically why a document or documents fall under one of the restricted headings. The proposed UK laws are diametrically opposite: I have to show why information should be released.
The US laws have been in existence for many years. The state didn't collapse as a result. True, there have been some red faces in government and the bureaucracy, but that's as it should be.
WILLIAM BOWLES
London SE1
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments