Letter: Theatre of libel
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: The libel case brought by Mr Hamilton against Mr Fayed once again raises the question of the purpose of English libel law.
Are libel laws there to protect anyone against libellous statements? Definitely not. The expense and length of the procedure renders it absolutely inaccessible to ordinary citizens. Instead, in libel case after libel case the public is asked to applaud the performances of millionaire defendants, eloquent QCs and majestic judges.
The libel case is a theatrical performance where the newspaper report is more important than justice. What we are asked to applaud is a shameful waste of resources, which could have been put to much better use defending real victims of injustice.
DOMINIQUE ROMMEL
Scalloway, Shetland
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments