Letter: The real Jesus
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: Keith Hopkins (Historical Notes, 11 November) casts doubt on the historical accuracy of the Gospels because they were written several decades after Jesus' death.
This sits oddly with the current enthusiasm for documentaries on this century's history, using eyewitness accounts. Presumably Hopkins thinks these often moving memories are worthless, given the years that have elapsed since the events took place.
The oral tradition was much stronger in Jesus' day than our own, and the recollection of a personal encounter with the radical and disturbing Galilean prophet was not something likely to fade from the Apostles' minds. Only such powerful memories could have inspired their unshakeable testimony (and that of countless Christians thereafter) in the face of persecution and death.
The idea that they would do that for some kind of "sacred hero" who pulled a confidence trick on the cross simply doesn't wash.
Dr JAMES K TORRENS
Leeds
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments