Letter: The nuclear past
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: Privatisation of BNFL (report, 25 September) gives the Labour government the best opportunity yet to shut down the THORP reprocessing plant and put an end to British trade in plutonium, an atom-bomb material.
Producing plutonium is not a proper commercial activity, nor is there a genuine market for plutonium as a commercial fuel. If there is any doubt on this point, let BNFL "test the market" by offering for sale the UK's 55-tonne stockpile of civilian plutonium as fuel for nuclear power reactors.
UK utilities have no need for plutonium because it is not suited for use in the type of reactors they operate. Foreign utilities prefer using low-enriched uranium fuel, which is cheaper, more efficient to burn, and cannot be made into bombs. Furthermore, it is now clear that reprocessing of spent fuel is unnecessary for waste-management reasons. Spent reactor fuel can best be disposed of directly, without reprocessing.
British governments avoided dealing with the issues of reprocessing and nuclear waste by claiming that these were commercial activities for BNFL to decide. If BNFL is privatised, the Government would have clear-cut responsibility for these activities and should begin immediately to formulate a nuclear-waste policy.
There is a large and profitable post-Cold-War market for BNFL's environmental cleanup services at nuclear-weapons production sites in the United States and Russia. On the other hand, reprocessing is a dead end, a relic from the Seventies when plutonium-fueled breeder reactors were the wave of the future. Now they are a relic of the past.
PAUL LEVENTHAL
President
SHARON TANZER
Vice President
Nuclear Control Institute
Washington DC
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments