Letter: The BBC's excesses
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: By necessity, actors live in a fantasy world and the recent announcement from Lord Attenborough and his luvvies ("Stars band together to demand more BBC cash"; letter, 24 December) proves they are totally out of touch with reality.
We all treasure the days when British TV was the best in the world but those days are long gone.
In the digital debate the word "quality" rarely if ever appears. The emphasis is always on more channels, more choice. But choice of what - more of the same trash?
Lord Attenborough quotes fundamental goals of the BBC including "to nurture creativity and to promote public understanding and learning". In reality it is the opposite. There has been a steady erosion of standards. Moronic soaps, mindless game shows, endless fly-on-the-wall docu-soaps, banal cooking, DIY and gardening shows have become the staple diet.
The programme makers mistakenly believe that the public is happy to fund their excesses.
The cost of broadcast quality television equipment has plummeted to the point where virtually anyone with the right know-how can produce high quality material in a spare room at low cost. I know this because I make a living from it. So, if anything, the licence fee should be reduced.
Instead additional money is sought to fund digital expenditure, including the so-called 24 hour news service that spends most of the time promoting itself.
We are being fed with drivel and expected to pay heavily for the privilege. Even moving to a satellite provider does not allow you to evade the financial shackles of the BBC licence fee.
DON HARRISON
Lytchett Matravers,
Dorset
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments