Letter: Thames threatened
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: Five years ago, a long-overdue initiative was launched amid widespread acclaim - the Thames Landscape Strategy, to conserve, protect and enhance the river Thames. A number of local authorities and organisations are "responsible" for the Thames, but the national interest too often slips through the gaps between them, and a series of planning decisions have been taken at a local level which have damaged the character and environment of this great natural and cultural asset.
The latest case is the former swimming pool site on Twickenham riverside which is rare in retaining its 18th-century buildings and village atmosphere. The proposals now before the Richmond upon Thames council comprise a development, seven stories high, with 37 apartments, an auditorium, cinemas and restaurants. This would be another out-of-scale development like the ice-rink site further down the river opposite Richmond Hill. There would be next to no open space left on this sensitive site.
We had hoped that such commercial over-development on the Thames was a thing of the past, and that such schemes would be judged by their effect on the Thames environment. The present scheme has aroused vehement local opposition and should be dropped.
Doing nothing is not an alternative. The borough needs the help and encouragement of all those interested in the future of the Thames, to produce a modest scheme which enhances the quality of this precious stretch of the river, and conserves the intimate scale and working character of the Twickenham and Eel Pie waterfronts.
Lord ATTENBOROUGH
Sir DAVID ATTENBOROUGH
Patron, the Thames Landscape Strategy
MARTIN BRUNT
DAVID CHURCH
Richmond Society
BAMBER GASCOIGNE
LADY PANUFNIK
BRIAN PARKER
Twickenham Society
PETE TOWNSHEND
Sir PETER WAKEFIELD
Twickenham, Middlesex
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments