Letter: Terror in Chechnya
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: Your report "Putin gives Clinton an icy rebuff on Chechnya" (8 December) quotes a Russian general in Chechnya as saying that the actions of the security forces involve the "minimum number of casualties" both among Russian soldiers and the civilian population. This cynical claim has been proven to be false throughout this war and in the last conflict, when 80,000 civilians died.
Your editorial in the same edition, "The threat to Chechnya questions Russia's claims to call itself a democracy", was absolutely correct in defining these actions as "war crimes" - both then and now. In both instances the West and international organisations reacted timidly to the actions of the Russian security forces by refusing to define them as crimes against humanity, and continued to provide the Russian government with large-scale financial assistance. Western leaders continued to pretend that Russia was both a "democracy" and a "market economy".
In the meantime, we have learnt that the West turned a blind eye to the fact that most of this assistance was laundered abroad by organised crime and corrupt officials, while the same standards were not applied towards Russia as towards Serbia.
Surely the time has arrived, as your editorial suggests, to "draw a line in the mud and snow" by not only ending further Western assistance but also by suspending Russia's membership of the Organisation for Security and Co-operation in Europe and the Council of Europe and by placing Russia's actions within the remit of the International War Crimes Tribunal in The Hague.
Dr TARAS KUZIO
Visiting Fellow, Canadian Institute of Ukrainian Studies
University of Alberta, Canada
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments