Letter: Teaching history
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: You report that "traditionalists triumphed" in the writing of a new National Curriculum for History ("Labour backs down over curriculum", 10 September). The new curriculum is an unmitigated defeat for all those who, like me, believe that the school history curriculum should pass on to children their birthright - a sense of national identity.
All the landmarks of British history are italicised in the new curriculum. This means that their status is as examples which do not have to be taught.
This optional status is confirmed in a letter from the School Curriculum and Assessment Authority and Ofsted, already in every school in the country. It states that "we would like to emphasise that it is very much up to individual schools to determine whether or not to use the italicised examples". So much for the triumph of traditionalists.
CHRIS McGOVERN
Director, History Curriculum Association
Heathfield, East Sussex
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments