Letter: Tax on the rich
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: In his letter (19 October) about poverty, Bill Smith deplores the shift from direct to indirect taxation and takes a swipe at VAT which "hits rich and poor" alike.
Unfortunately he overlooks the fact that VAT does not apply to a range of essential items including food (except when consumed on the premises), children's clothing, public transport, books and newspapers. Nor is there VAT on water, although there is (for environmental reasons and now at only 5 per cent) on electricity and gas. Amazingly, even the Tories left intact this gesture towards need despite pressure from the EU - the same does not apply uniformly in other countries.
One could argue for ever that many other items could easily be considered as essential, but few would dispute those listed above. It follows that VAT could be claimed to be a tax on the rich, who are the only people able to afford goods which do not feature on the exempt list.
COLIN MURISON SMALL
London SE27
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments