Letter: Taming the tabloids
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: David Aaronovitch proposes invading the privacy of tabloid editors ("The shameful sex scandals of the dirty tabloid editors (I hope)", 10 November). Two wrongs may not make a right, but they might make lip- smacking entertainment.
Clive Soley, after all these years, is still surprised that the Press Complaints Commission ducks its responsibility ("Our press is still too intrusive", 10 November). Isn't that what the proprietors fund it to do?
The frenzy about homosexual politicians can be relied on to produce another half-baked clause tacked on to the PCC's universally ignored code. Then everything will go quiet until the next big media flap.
We are told that editors should do something. Proprietors should do something. Politicians should do something. Watchdogs should do something. The public should stop reading (fat chance).
The people who should tackle the ethical lapses of the media are the journalists - both the minority who offend and the majority who suffer animosity and contempt.
The National Union of Journalists code of conduct dates back to the 1930s. Why isn't it combined with the PCC code? Like whistle-blowers, journalists who refuse to work in the gutter should have statutory protection.
We hear what train drivers think of Railtrack, what nurses think of health trusts. Why do we never hear ordinary journalists' views?
Partly because most publishers are so neurotic about pay, hours of work, copyright etc that they won't allow the NUJ to be mentioned in their pages. (The Independent managed to report the recent BBC strike without even saying the NUJ was involved.) And partly because the NUJ leadership is in the grip of the ultra-left, preferring internecine strife to confronting the concerns of members.
If the majority of Britain's journalists don't wake up and force their own union to tackle ethical issues, they will remain near the bottom of the popularity polls. And they will lack the moral authority to persuade employers, clients and the public to treat them more fairly.
BERNIE CORBETT
National Organiser (Freelance & Training)
National Union of Journalists
London WC1
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments