Letter: Tabloids beware
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: There is no right to privacy under English law. There is no law to protect the private lives of entertainers nor the past lives of figures now in the public eye.
Next year, however, Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights, which provides for a right to respect for private and family life becomes part of our domestic law under the Human Rights Act 1998. This is to some extent qualified by section 12 of the Act, which provides that in determining what is an invasion of privacy, the court must have particular regard to the right of freedom of expression (Article 10 of the Convention). Section 12 also provides, however, that the court must consider the extent to which it is, or would be, in the public interest for the material to be published.
Is it in the public interest to learn of Lenny Henry's assignations in a hotel room or of Sophie Rhys-Jones's playful antics 10 years ago ? I think not, and welcome the changes that the new Act will bring.
Even if the News of the World were to make out a feeble case of public interest with regard to the Dallaglio revelations, the undercover means used to expose him have appalled most people. It is worth remembering that similar methods were used in an attempt to get Colin Stagg, suspected of murdering Rachel Nickell, to talk. The information obtained was held to be inadmissible in court. It is surely wrong that the tabloids can get away with a method of questioning in order to get a good story that is denied to our police when questioning murder suspects.
JILL JANNEY
London SW13
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments