Letter: Support for Nato
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: Nato's aim has been to impose a settlement on the region by bombing the Serbs into submission. As the conflict intensifies, more and more Kosovan Albanians who give refuge and support to the KLA - now supported by Nato - either leave or are forced by the Serbs to leave.
Unfortunately, throughout the former Yugoslavia ethnic cleansing has been all too prevalent. When 500,000 Serbs were ethnically cleansed by the Croats a few years ago, Nato voiced no concern.
However well-intentioned Nato's motives in engaging Yugoslavia, its actions have resulted in Nato's transformation from a defensive into an aggressive alliance against the statutes of its own charter.
This has led to a breakdown of military cooperation on world security between Nato on the one hand and Russia and China on the other. It has also formed a new justification for non-Nato countries to acquire nuclear weapons as the only means of defence against an aggressive Nato.
Nato, whose role was so purposeful in successfully defending Western Europe from the Soviet Union during the Cold War, is now lost in its new aggressive role. For Nato, negotiation has become a dirty word and only complete capitulation by Milosevic is acceptable. In order to achieve that, civilian collateral damage is seen as OK, provided it is not intentional.
Count ANDREI TOLSTOY
London WC1
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments