Letter: Suing the doctors
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: Lord Justice Otton is rightly concerned by the difficulties facing claimants in medical negligence actions (report, 12 November). However, he fails to recognise the detrimental effect of legal aid on the litigation process. Lawyers are encouraged to pursue weak cases, depleting funds intended for patient care.
According to the Legal Aid Board, the main funder of medical negligence actions, 12,556 cases were closed in 1996-97. In only 2,503 (fewer than 20 per cent) were damages awarded or agreed, despite the practice of legal aid "blackmail", when modest claims are paid off regardless of merit to avoid greater irrecoverable legal costs.
By contrast, medical negligence claims funded by conditional fee agreements (supported by after-event insurance) have a very high success rate because cases are properly assessed. There is an identity of interest of the claimant, the lawyer and insurer: all want the claim to succeed.
The way forward is for medical negligence litigation to be funded by conditional fee arrangements with state assistance where necessary for the expert reports and the insurance premium.
ANTHONY BARTON
London N1
The writer is a solicitor and medical practitioner
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments