Letter: Subsidy to London
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: Sarah Hogg ("England gets tired of constant gifts to Scotland", 20 December) presents interesting factors on government spending across the UK and the possible rationale for high levels of spending in Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland. She implies that government spending in Scotland is high in relation to its reasonable level of Gross Domestic Product.
The latest official figures confirm that pounds 4,772 per head was spent in Scotland in 1997, 18 per cent above the UK average. Figures for the English regions are not exactly comparable but I estimate that the Government would have been spending around pounds 4,700 per head in London, 16 per cent above the UK average and only 2 per cent below the Scotland figure.
In comparison, spending in Yorkshire and Humberside would be less than pounds 3,900 per head and 17 per cent less than the London figure. In relation to the GDP figures this looks perverse, as London's GDP is 40 per cent higher than Yorkshire Humberside's.
The high level of government spending in London adds to inflationary pressures and congestion costs in London, increases its competitive advantage over other regions, and holds back economic growth across much of the country. If there is a case for high levels of government spending in London then there is an even stronger case for such levels of spending in the poorest part of the UK.
D R SMITH
Principal Research Officer
Sheffield City Council
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments