Letter: Strongarm Tories

Peter Tatchell
Tuesday 30 November 1999 19:02 EST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Sir: The post-mortems on the Kensington and Chelsea by-election have overlooked a particularly sinister, authoritarian aspect of the campaign: the demise of free speech and the curtailment of the right to quiz candidates on their policies.

During the campaign, Mr Portillo was constantly ringed by Tory party minders, in order to prevent me (and anyone else) asking him awkward questions. I was not allowed to politely query how he will vote on the forthcoming Bills to equalise the age of consent and repeal Section 28.

Last Friday, Channel Four News showed me being manhandled by Tory minders. Who authorised these strongarm tactics? Did Mr Portillo and Mr Hague approve their use? Since when have such methods been acceptable in British politics?

Equally disturbing, when Mr Portillo wanted to avoid my questions at Kensington fire station, six police vehicles arrived to stop me getting near him. What offence was I committing that warranted such a heavy police response? How does Sir Paul Condon justify the behaviour of his officers? Did his force act in a partisan way which made them, in effect, agents for the Conservative campaign?

This suppression of dissent is something we normally associate with election campaigns in repressive states such as Indonesia and Serbia, not with democratic Britain. Some people may disagree with what I say, but I hope they would defend my right to say it. Democracy and free elections are imperilled if we fail to challenge these infringements of open debate and the right to question candidates.

PETER TATCHELL

OutRage!

London SW14

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in