Letter: Second opinions
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: Gillian Hall (letter, 19 November) raises the issue of a patient's right to a second opinion.
GPs are their patient's advocates and, as such, they have a duty to secure the best possible care for them. This involves referral where a specialist opinion is appropriate. There is no question of it being unethical to seek two opinions on the same condition in the same patient.
However, family doctors do have a responsibility not to subject their patients to unnecessary repeated examinations and investigation. There is a duty to use NHS resources appropriately, so that the maximum benefit is gained for the whole of society.
Each case has to be judged on its merits. In Dr Ledward's case the profession failed its patients inexcusably.
SIMON FRADD
Doctor Patient Partnership
London WC1
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments