Letter: Scrubbed marbles
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: Sadly, Greece's cultural attache, Victoria Solomonidis, resorts to abuse in order to avoid the issue of how classical art should best be preserved and presented ("Greece and UK row over who has cleanest marbles," 6 November).
My claim - apropos of demands that the British Museum hand over the Elgin marbles to an as yet undesigned museum in Athens - that the marbles taken by Lord Elgin are today in better condition than those that remain in Athens is not "a reflection of long-running British arrogance" but a demonstrable statement of fact.
If Dr Solomonidis will not accept this, I would challenge her to defend a comparison of blocks recently taken down from the temple of Athena Nike and housed in the Acropolis Museum with those from the same temple housed in the British Museum.
That Greek buildings and carvings have been damaged by pollution and, on occasion, by bungled restoration is recognised and regretted by Greek and British scholars alike. Flogging the British Museum today over the unauthorised use of copper chisels by restorers during a restoration in the 1930s, when (much harder) steel chisels and wire brushes were authorised in Athens in 1953, smacks of selective amnesia if not intellectual dishonesty.
Dr Solomonidis now insists that Americans, not Greeks, should bear responsibility for that later restoration. This is unjust and ungracious. It is a matter of record that the cleaning "was undertaken after consultation with the Greek archaeological authorities" (Archaeology, 7, 1954).
A letter sent from the American director of the programme to the British Museum's head of science in 1953 reported that "The Greek archaeological authorities inspected the work both during its progress and after; they expressed themselves well pleased."
MICHAEL DALEY
East Barnet, Hertfordshire
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments