Letter: Save songbirds
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Letter: Save songbirds
Sir: Thank you for your timely articles on our disappearing wildlife, particularly the drastic decline in farmland birds. We have reached this desperate situation by neglecting to follow traditional farming practices.
All of us travelling through the countryside pass gapped and mutilated hedges that are mechanically flailed every year to within an inch of their lives. These hedges are cut so low and thin that they provide birds with no cover to protect them from predators and disturbance during nesting.
Cutting hedges every year prevents hawthorn, which flowers on year-old wood, from producing berries as food for birds in the winter. In contrast to the "tidy" hedges surrounding most farmland, the tall, thick hawthorn hedge outside my house teems with sparrows, buntings, blackbirds, robins and tits and is beautiful in flower in summer and fruit in winter.
The Government could easily extend the measures that already exist for the protection of trees to our surviving hedges.
If, in addition, we want to help reverse the loss of our ground-nesting birds such as skylarks, plovers and grey partridge, then the Government must resist the unlimited area access demanded by a small militant minority of Right to Roam campaigners. Most people do understand that in order to preserve our wildlife there must be restrictions to prevent disturbance and that unlimited access over the remaining habitat for a selfish few would leave nothing for the rest of us to enjoy in the future.
OLIVER FENTON
Dewsbury, West Yorkshir
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments