Letter: Safety in the skies

Colin Murison Small
Sunday 01 August 1999 18:02 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Sir: I have misgivings that the proposed new law to fight air rage (report, 27 July) may be another instance of over-reaction.

Of course nobody wants rowdyism or fights on board an aircraft, but nor do we want it on a train, coach or bus. However, the physical danger to the aircraft is exaggerated: it would take extreme behaviour (and much more than a fist) to break a window and it is, I understand, impossible to open the doors during flight.

In the old days when smoking was permitted on aircraft, the order to stop smoking, stow tables and return seats to upright was given some five minutes before touchdown. Today it tends to be given the moment the pilot begins his descent from 30,000 feet, often half an hour before touchdown.

When I asked recently why it was necessary for me to stop reclining at so early a stage, my airhostess snapped back that it was company policy and if I didn't like it I could write to the airline. Your report suggests that my perfectly reasonable question will in future be termed an "anti- social activity that hampers staff" and I will find myself being prosecuted.

COLIN MURISON SMALL

London SE27

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in