Letter: Safer streets, please
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: Any reduction in premature deaths is surely to be welcomed, but last year's reduction in road casualties ("Road deaths are lowest recorded", 10 September) should be seen in the context of the decline in walking, cycling and playing on our streets.
Many dangerous streets have a virtually non-existent casualty rate for the simple reason that parents are too frightened of traffic to let their children walk, cycle or play in them. The real test of road safety policy is whether road casualties can be reduced while increasing the number of people who feel it is safe enough to walk and cycle.
The huge decline in children's independent mobility and fitness must not be the price we have to pay for a lower road casualty rate. The review of speed limits due out soon must treat our vulnerable road-users as a priority. Children should once again be allowed to use our streets in relative safety and the road casualty rate must come down even further.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments