Letter: Sacred trees
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: David Keys seems to report as a generality that after the Roman conquest sacred trees were removed ("Ancient Surrey temple shows Celts were tree-worshippers", 11 September). Not so. Large numbers of parish churches have been built to the south of yew trees that are now generally recognised to be some 3,000 years old.
The unanswered question is how these sacred trees often survived as hallowed sites between Celtic times and the Anglo-Saxon conversion. Of course, the sites being under venerable churches makes the answer more difficult but, since there was a reluctance in medieval times to bury to the north of the church, there may still be places where one can dig.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments