Letter: Road by rail
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: It is disheartening that Railtrack is ditching piggyback plans for London to Glasgow (report, 19 November). The mind really boggles at this decision, bearing in mind the road congestion in this country and the Government's plans to move freight from road to rail.
Piggyback is particularly important now that we have a Channel Tunnel, and with proposals to upgrade the West Coast line (the extra cost to accommodate piggy-back traffic is put at pounds 100m only) lorry trailers could move on rail cars from places such as Glasgow, Manchester and Liverpool to terminals in Italy (such as Milan) and other European countries. After all, the system, has been used for many years from the French ports of Dunkirk, Le Havre and Cherbourg to centres in Italy and other countries and it is downright depressing to think of a missed opportunity. What a difference from the attitude of the Port of Tyne, which last month announced plans to establish a rail link from the deep Riverside Quay to other parts of the UK and through the Channel Tunnel to other European countries.
One hopes that John Prescott will put as much pressure as possible on Railtrack to ensure that their decision is reversed so as to implement the White Paper on the future of transport and ease the road congestion in this country (with its economic and environmental costs).
It is ironic that the flushing out of Railtrack by the Commons Select Committee last Wednesday was during the same week that Railtrack launched its nature conservation campaign.
DONALD DAVIES
London EC4
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments