Letter: Reform of adoption
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: Jack Straw is entirely right to insist that local authorities encourage, rather than discourage, adoption. Your report says, "80 per cent of adoptions are judged a success." Judged by whom? The same social workers who make adoption such a difficult, agonising, and guilt-laden process today?
The alternative is council care, with the prospects that that offers - lives at an exacerbated risk of unemployment, drug dependency, homelessness, crime, and imprisonment. I suspect that if it was measured against that alternative, the real success rate of adoption would be seen to be nearer to 98 or 99 per cent.
What is more, the chances of success of an adoption are much higher when the child is adopted very young, as a baby. The drawn-out and bureaucratic nature of today's adoption process renders that almost impossible, making subsequent adaptation by parents and child all the harder.
DAVID DAVIS MP
(Haltemprice and Howden, C)
House of Commons
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments