Letter: Recycled reefs

Peter Martin
Tuesday 26 January 1999 19:02 EST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Sir: The reaction of Greenpeace and the Government to Professor David Bellamy's suggestion that oil platforms be reused as artificial reefs (report, 23 January) illustrates the sad state of environmental thinking in this country.

Adopting the philosophy of reuse, recycle or rethink, the best option is to find an alternative use for the old platforms before expending vast amounts of energy in moving, dismantling and melting them down.

Any fisherman or scuba diver (including myself) will tell you that marine life congregates around even the smallest irregularity on the sea bed - and large wrecks in particular.

Professor Bellamy's plan finds a new use for these structures which saves money, saves energy, returns iron to the sea and provides a mechanism for preserving fish stocks, which are nearing the point of irreversible decline.

The oil companies (and the Government) could use some of the money saved to set up a hatchery programme to boost stocks of juvenile fish on the new reefs. These could be maintained either directly by the fishing industry or by switching subsides from the fishermen to the hatcheries.

This solution is not merely "using the sea as a dumping ground".

PETER MARTIN

Tetbury,

Gloucestershire

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in