Letter: Rationing by age

Elizabeth Moughton
Thursday 11 November 1999 19:02 EST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Sir: Ageism can work the other way, too. I am 67 and have an arthritic knee which my NHS consultant tells me will need to be replaced at some time in the future - "but we don't like doing this until the 70s". The rationale behind this is that a replacement knee is expected to last about 15 years and a second replacement is not usually very successful.

Both my parents and both my grandmothers, as well as sundry aunts and uncles, have lived to be 90-96. I therefore expect to live well into my mid-90s. Will I have to wait until I am nearly 80 before I have my knee operation?

ELIZABETH MOUGHTON

Dorking,

Surrey

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in