Letter: Rail disasters

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Sir: Geoffrey Thompson (letter, 15 July) is right: any "cheap fares"

policy for London that does not apply to mainline suburban services is

unfair to the "ratepayers" of the south-east quadrant of London, which

is not served by the Underground.

The answer is to emulate German cities such as Hamburg by creating a

Verkehrsverbund that incorporates mainline suburban services. Such a "transport

confederation", independent of city government but acting in the city's

best interests, would receive all fare revenues from the transport operators

and would refund their operating costs. Investment would be funded through

the confederation, which would have the same overall planning role as

the former GLC.

Lack of such an overall planning body for rail development has, I am

convinced, been the main reason for London's lamentable lack of progress,

compared with German cities and Paris, over many decades. Separate planning

staffs at London Transport and British Rail saw themselves as rivals for

public funds, and put forward competitive schemes inspired by no overall

vision.

In recent years the "Crossrail" scheme (a tunnel route carrying mainline

trains) has been in competition with the LT "Chelsea-Hackney" scheme (for

yet another small-bore tube line).

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in