Letter: Race and the police
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: When Jim Callaghan decided that the police should be excluded from the scope of race relations legislation, that inevitably sent a signal to the police that they
were not meant to take race relations seriously.
The Home Secretary is the police authority for the Metropolitan Police district, yet holders of that office are speaking as if they have no personal responsibility for the overall conduct of the Met. Given their general power "to give directions to the Commissioner as to the operational control of the Metropolitan Police", Callaghan's successors could have instructed the Commissioner to tell his officers to behave as if the Race Relations legislation did apply to them - and to cooperate fully with public inquiries.
Did Jack Straw and his predecessors do that? If not, why not?
ERIC THOMPSON
London NW2
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments