Letter: Public inconvenience

Stephen Tyrell
Wednesday 25 August 1999 19:02 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Sir: Oliver Bennett's appreciation of "disabled loos" should serve as a useful learning point for all architects and designers (The Joys of Modern Life, 24 August).

If spaces, vehicles and facilities are organised in a way that's accessible to disabled people, they become easier to use for everyone. Think how automatic doors and level thresholds improve the shopping experience of parents with buggies, as well as older people less steady on their feet.

However, Mr Bennett's assessment that the common use of keys to access "disabled" toilet facilities is "sad - and, yes, fair" unfortunately lacks appreciation of the major inconvenience and distress this practice causes disabled patrons. I doubt that he would appreciate being two and a half pints down in a crowded weekend pub to find that he had to locate a key in order to use the only loo available to, say, journalists.

Why should disabled people be required to develop superhuman powers of personal control because of what he calls "all kinds of nefarious practices" perpetrated by non-disabled opportunists? A visit to any London pub or club loo will surely prove that traditional smaller cubicles are also popular venues for a variety of non-ablution related activity. We welcome Mr Bennett's delight in a spacious and private loo, but a convenience is not convenient when it's locked.

STEPHEN TYRELL

Scope

London N7

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in