Letter: Protect your image
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: While the "facial mapping" system in Newham will undoubtedly have benefits for policing ("Hi-tech aid boosts spy cameras", 6 October), it underlines the urgent need for regulation of high-street CCTV systems. The identification of a person in a city centre at the touch of a button offers a unique form of surveillance. Although the new Data Protection Act covers the processing of CCTV image data, it is not designed to deal with such sophisticated data-matching.
With government moves to create near-national digital pictorial databases from the passport and new driving licence photographs, there is a real prospect that public and civic life will no longer carry an expectation of anonymity. As a recent House of Lords report highlighted, tighter controls on CCTV systems are required in order to strike a fair balance with civil liberties.
MADELEINE COLVIN
Director of Legal Policy
Justice
London EC4
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments