Letter: Private money
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: As the former chief executive of the Radcliffe Infirmary NHS Trust, with responsibility for putting together the plan for the new hospital in Oxford, I have to take issue with the letter from John Denham, Minister of State for Health, defending the Private Finance Initiative (16 July).
The inescapable fact is that the cost of borrowing money for the private sector is greater than for the Government. The costs of maintenance and other things are being used as a smokescreen or spin for the minister to hide behind. If a straight comparison is made on the cost of financing the capital for building new hospitals, the public sector scheme will be better value for money.
The Private Finance consortiums are intent on reducing risk and making a profit. The NHS will be paying the costs of that risk-avoidance and profit margin for years to come.
What also surprises me is that the bid to build a new hospital in Oxford had to be submitted to the Department of Health in September 1998 to enable ministers to make a decision by Christmas. What they didn't tell us was which Christmas! If the Private Finance Initiative is as good as Mr Denham claims, why did it take so long to make the decision?
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments